Expert systems have had a chequered history. They failed to live up to exaggerated promises that were made on their behalf when they first appeared. Yet they have had occasional successes. And they seem to be making a bit of a come back. There is much talk these days of TagentsU-- self-contained computer programs that will go off on their own down networks and return with, for example, your information needs. Such agents will contain expert systems.
In studying expert systems, you would really want to know what has been done, how it has been done, how to do it, and how to improve on it. You should then be able to judge whether expert systems have anything to offer to the field of information resources.
The prototypes of most expert systems have been written in one of the two artificial intelligence languages, LISP or Prolog. A student should learn to read one or both of these. Either of these languages would be suitable for writing expert systems. But also the core algorithms of expert systems lend themselves to being described either by a pattern matching rewrite language (like the programming language of Mathematica) or by a pure object oriented language like Smalltalk. A student should be able to write basic expert systems using one of these four environments.
As a default in this course, students will be taught to read and write Prolog to the level necessary for dealing with expert systems. (Students are free to use any of the other languages mentioned, and I am happy to give instruction and guidance on this outside the formal lectures.) Then we will look at standard techniques including production rule systems, pattern matching, forward and backward chaining and reasoning under conditions of uncertainty. In the second half of the course, students will be encouraged to work in teams, to seek out problems in information resources that would benefit from expert system approaches, and to write suitable expert systems.
The course as a whole will make extensive use of computers and will have substantial academic content. It is assumed that a student in this course has NO previous background in computing.
Internal Internal Graduate College
90-100 A+ A
85-89 A A
80-84 A- A
75-79 B+ B
70-74 B B
65-69 B- B
below 64 C C
Thus, for example, a mark of Internal: 82 A- External: A on a piece of work would be seen by outsiders as an A; however, the A- will convey to you that the work can be improved.
The coursework will count for 60% of the final grade, and the final exam for 40% of the grade.